For people of Paris, Toronto, London, Istanbul and New York, it is quite confusing to understand the role of science and technology in courts. One of the major aspects of criminal justice is science or the practice of scientifically examining physical evidence collected from a crime scene.
If there are no eyewitnesses to the offenses, forensic evidence is all prosecutors have to work with. For example, human remains have been decayed, and it is impossible to recognize them in a better way.
In such circumstances, scientists use DNA from the body, study the skeletal structure or examine dental work to find out who the person was. Forensic scientists often use ballistics and blood tests as evidence. Thus, the importance of science in the courts cannot be overstated.
It is sometimes the key to proving that someone is innocent or guilty of the action for which he has been charged. It’s safe to say that scientific evidence helps solve a variety of brutal and nonviolent cases.
A forensic scientist is also responsible for looking for evidence in a case where sexual assault is suspected. In some cases, DNA tests are enough to prove or disapprove allegations of child molestation or rape.
However, the field of science is not limited to evidence obtained from the human body. Ballistics also tells us a lot about where gunfire has been involved. How many shots did a criminal fire? Ballistics helps answer a variety of questions and solve various mysteries.
Legal representations that understand the significance of scientific evidence in courts can put together all of the pieces of the puzzle to provide us with the comprehensive defense. Science plays a vital role in identifying the culprits of various cyber crimes. It may not be possible for the judges to take the right decision without the involvement of forensic science.
I am sure this has been an interesting post for everyone in New York, Toronto, Paris, Istanbul and London. What do you say?